Discussion about this post

User's avatar
The Rational Walk's avatar

I agree that the clamoring for “more disclosure” is just code-speak for initiating earnings guidance and quarterly calls. While I would like to see more details on the subsidiaries, that desire is tempered by the need to avoid unnecessary exposure to competitors. That’s because I’m an owner. Analysts are not; they are simply doing a job and want it to be easier to do their job, so they want to be spoon fed numbers even if it actually harms owners.

Ultimately, Berkshire operates under the principle of a seamless web of deserved trust. Buffett and Munger clearly warranted this trust, made possible by a unique shareholder base. I personally trust Greg Abel and I think other longtime shareholders do as well. I doubt many longtime shareholders will be clamoring for quarterly calls or guidance anytime soon!

Expand full comment
Robots and Chips's avatar

Really interesting point about the inadequate disclosure argument from KBW. I think Berkshire's aproach to communication is actually more honest than most companies that put out endless guidance and host those earnings calls where analysts fish for soundbites. The annual letters and direct shareholder communication has always felt more substantive to me. Curious to see how Greg Abel handles this pressue from Wall Street once Buffett steps back fully.

Expand full comment
11 more comments...

No posts