Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Arthur Clarke's avatar

Berkshire’s sale of Apple shares raises an interesting question: how did Warren do it? He couldn’t have sold that many shares quickly given the trading restraints. My thinking is that he applied a practice that he has successfully employed with share repurchases. This process was implemented to enable estates, and others, including index funds, to liquidate large positions through negotiated, off-market transactions. This process, I’m sure, was welcomed by indexes—holding B shares—which normally rebalance at the close or open of the market, when Berkshire cannot trade. I noticed that in June only, I recall, 400 A shares were repurchased. (As an aside, I would be interested in learning what the percentage of shares of each class are purchased through market versus off-market transactions.) In the case of Apple, I would be willing to bet that Warren and Tim Cook negotiated the transaction off market. Such a transaction would benefit both Berkshire and Apple with one transaction. Each party would get a fair price: Berkshire would have received a higher price than it would have averaged, if it had had to dribble out shares over weeks or months. Similarly, Apple paid a lower price than the average price of shares similarly purchased over an extended period. A fine example of fair trading. It is a further example of Apple’s safety for Berkshire with such a large position: Apple had the cash and a willingness to repurchase its share. For Berkshire it removed the risk of being caught in a forced fire sale.

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts